Sometimes the warmth of multiplying
cells can be a sign of health. The expectant mother feels the warmth of her child
in utero; a sign of the furious growth of the unborn child.
Inflammation of another order is the
first indication of disease.
Cells have become exhausted,
repeatedly being asked to divide in order to multiply in order to replace the
ones killed by toxicity. The bi-product of their toil is the generation of
heat: inflammation. Instead of the normal cell's mode of metabolism, they regress
into a very primitive, yeast-like mode of reproduction. They cut off the nerve
supply which tells them what to do. Like the bottom of a smelly compost heap
that's deprived of oxygen, they grow and split (mitosis) by a process of
fermentation. They are similar in colour, and probably in smell, to the bottom
of the oxygen deprived compost heap.
In the present age, many of us with
long-term inflamed tissue already have cancer cells in our bodies. They are
cells which are fed up with our bad government and have revolted. Without
repeated trauma or toxicity they wouldn't even be there. We impose toxicity of
various orders on our bodies, and the end result is a lack of cooperation from cells
in that region, which decide to go and do their own thing. They were initially
not the enemy that they now appear to be. They were once not foreign to us, but
have now become so.
Anyone here who's done any home
brewing will know that the yeast in the modern fermenting process needs lots of
refined sugar (which is acidic) in order to multiply, and the same yeast will
die if oxygen is allowed into the brewing container.
Refined sugar is like rocket fuel for
cancer cells: they LOVE it. In P.E.T. scans you're injected with radioactive
glucose, and after an hour's circulation, you're scanned. The cancer is
inferred wherever the glucose is most concentrated. Doesn't it follow that
sugar feeds cancer cells?
The McMillan nurses' cookbook is full
of recipes laden with refined sugar, telling you it's fine to eat it. There are
machines in Clatterbridge cancer hospital selling Coca Cola and Mars Bars. The
simple correlation hasn't occurred to them yet. It's certain that one has to
get the weight back on after gruelling carcinogenic chemotherapy, but refined
sugar ... isn't that the number one thing to be avoided? A few days back I
posted a list of the other names that this killer non-food has been given. Many
of them lead us astray. For example, don't be fooled into thinking that
fructose is pure fruit sugar, because it isn't ... it's refined sugar.
Even in relatively fit people, refined
sugar floods the blood. The blood can't handle it, and deposits it in the fat
cells of the body.
But the body does need sugar in order
to operate, and essential, slow-release sugars found in plant life don't flood
the blood as quickly. They are highly beneficial. Not only does plant life give
the necessary sugar, but it also feeds the body with cancer-defeating oxygen. Again,
see the analogy with alcohol brewing. Introduce oxygen into your beer
fermentation and it kills the process.
There is much talk today of cancer
stem cells, the cells that are not killed by chemotherapy. If the stem cells
are the ring-leaders of the revolt, it may be that they will sadly have to be
sacrificed. The cells which these renegades have spawned may well be coaxed, by
appropriate nutrition, to rejoin the body's economy.
Every cell in our body is
intelligent, it holds in potential the necessary information from which it can
produce a new individual. But self-motivated cancer cells, without their sense
of community, simply carry on multiplying. We've exhausted them. They've cut
off our governing nerve supply and don't have the sensitivity to recognise that
their course ultimately leads to self-destruction along with the host.
What's happening in Syria today can
be an example of what happens when the people (in our case the cells of the
body) are subjected to misrule. At the microscopic level the body can become
just as much of a disaster area as Aleppo. We can fight and destroy them, but
taking it to the extreme with chemo (like the Syrian government with its toxic
bombs) does nothing for the health or the well-being, neither of a country nor
an individual body. This is illustrated by the poor statistical success rates using
the chemotherapeutic method.
"As above, so below", is a
saying attributed to Hermes Trismegistus. Unless we view the body
holistically, we're not getting the whole picture.
To love is to work for the full development of whatever potential is loved. If
you love the body, and wish to develop its full, healthy potential, the loving
approach tends to it, gives it the nourishment it so desperately needs in this
toxic, nutrition deprived world.
If you believe in modern medicine, I
wish you the best of health with your chosen method.
But I believe that the fight isn't
against cancer, it's the noble one against the conditions, both internal and external,
which have brought it about. Fighting the good fight has always meant the same
thing ... becoming as little children, returning to health by overcoming the ill
habit patterns embraced since childhood.
Some sources suggest it was 1 in 100
in 1900.
Nixon declared war on cancer in the
seventies when it was 1 in 10.
Now, after 3 trillion dollars of
investment in the pharma approach ($3,000,000,000,000)
... it's 1 in 3 for women, and 1 in 2 for men. It's a thriving business
producing very little reward.
If we carry on like this, could it be
every one of us?
Meanwhile, pharmacy keeps on taking
the money
Good health is not the only benefit upon
winning the struggle ... there's freedom from domination by advertising,
freedom from poorly educated pharma-reliant doctors, freedom from
medication, a greater understanding of how the world is being governed by corporative
profits, renewed vigour and internal energy, joy at what we've learned ... and,
not least, a feeling that we're in the world but not of it.
X
https://educateinspirechange.org/health/experienced-butcher-admits-see-cancer-pork-just-cut-still-sell-customers/
