Wednesday, 29 April 2020

Pasteur and "Underlying health issues"

Has everyone got their sleeves rolled up ready for the Bill Gates latest hi-tech vaxx contribution to health ... perhaps ill-health?



The internet abounds with nay-sayers who vehemently refute the attached, well-referenced article. Perhaps you join me in my suspicion of which companies influence these attacks, standing to lose billions if the following was recognised as the truth: It isn't the virus that's the problem, but the 'millieu', whether or not the terrain it encounters is hospitable for habitation and spawning itself. 

Eat fresh, organic wherever you can my friends. "Just Eat" isn't an appropriate mantra in the production of a healthy body.

A clip extracted from this link:

 Let me point out here parenthetically that Pasteur was sharply criticised for failing to recognise the importance of the terrain (the soil in which disease develops). They said he was too one-sidedly preoccupied with the apparent cause of disease: the microbe itself. 

There were! in fact! many disputes about this between Pasteur and his great contemporary! Claude Bernard the former insisted on the importance of the disease producer ... the latter on the body's own equilibrium. 

Pasteur's work on immunity induced with serums and vaccines shows he recognised the importance of the soil. 

In any event, it is rather significant that Pasteur attached so much importance to this point that on his deathbed he said 
to Professor Renon who looked after him, "Bernard avait raison. le germe n'est rien! c'est le terrain qui est tout."

(Bernard was right. The microbe is nothing! the soil is everything.)


https://www.scribd.com/document/310586897/Louis-Pasteur-Recants-His-Germ-Theory

No comments:

Post a Comment