Vaccines: a warning from Suzanne Humphries

It has been shown that viruses presented intravenously, along with their associated adjuvants, are capable of reverse transcribing. That is, they can influence changes in cell RNA, which in turn act on cell DNA, with the likely possibility of producing cancerous developments. 

It's not surprising that we have so much faith in vaccination programs when the benefit, however inaccurately determined and insufficiently tested, is forcefully pressed home by a campaign which works on people's fear centre.

In this video, Dr. Suzanne Humphries has it that medical residency merely turned her into a highly trained technician for the pharmaceutical industry. Following are some of the points she raises in this talk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFQQOv-Oi6U

[Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health FULL PART ONE]

"Vaccination for swine flu causes kidney failure. Often you will make a correlation between a new symptom and a vaccine. When presented with patients who have new symptoms, one of the first questions that a G.P. should ask is, 'when did you have your last inoculation'. 

"Doctors are not taught about vaccines in medical school, not taught about adjuvants which open up the body's defences to allow the vaccine to take hold. Many vaccines contain monosodium glutamate which passes through neutralised defences and can cause brain damage. Doctors are not taught where they are manufactured, what kind of animals go into them, nor are they taught any potential dangers of vaccination. They are just given a piece of paper saying when vaccines are due, and to give them. 

"Populations who stopped vaccinating for smallpox, their smallpox diseases declined and deaths from smallpox declined." Polio history is so complicated, but she firmly believes from the graphical evidence presented, that it wasn't the polio vaccine that made polio go away. And polio is not what she once thought it was.

misrepresentation of the efficacy of measles jabs

Measles: Parents are told of the world death rate from measles, but are not told that these deaths are in places like Africa. Certainly nowhere near as high in the UK. Cod liver oil has vitamin A and it is key to recovery from measles. We used to have measles parties so that every child would get it and create a herd immunity. 

Measles virus uses up an enormous amount of the body's vitamin A. Could it be that the problems of deafness, etc. suffered by the child is an indirect result of  the measles itself ... the ensuing lack of vitamin A? 

The measles vaccine was introduced when the incidence of death from measles was close to zero. Improved food, child labour laws, and plumbers separating sewage from drinking water meant that the child's vitality was vastly improved, enabling it to deal more effectively with childhood illness. The death rate was almost down to nil, even before antibiotics and inoculations were introduced. A graph from dissolvingillusions.com shows deaths from measles in green, which by the time vaccines were introduced was hovering at zero. In the graph, 'pertussis' is another name for whooping cough.

http://www.dissolvingillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/G11.2-UK-Deaths-1838-1978.png

chemotherapy drugs and their dangers

What isn't made clear when you are propelled on the course of chemotherapy is how highly toxic these chemicals are. Indeed, if any is spilt on a nurse's bare flesh it is considered a medical emergency.

A friend who used to work with chemo-therapy drugs in his role a pharmacist, knowing their very real danger, says that he was always extremely careful in the handling of them.

https://www.cancertutor.com/chemospill/

[If such precautions are needed to be taken on the outside, then what is it doing to me on the inside?]

 

What also isn't made clear is that the drugs used to treat lymph cancers destroy the bone marrow, the source of beneficial autoimmune cells. The autoimmune system is the most important system in the handling of diseases.

Danger from mammograms

Although I haven't personally suffered with breast complaints, I do feel at this point that it's worthwhile indicating problems which can arise with the use of mammogram detection equipment.

The following videos suggest that it is advisable never to use a mammogram to check for cancer, always ask for ultrasonic, or better, a thermogram. If one can't be provided, seek one privately. Mammograms are not as accurate as other methods of diagnosis. Many alternative practitioners believe that the pressure used in the clamp is sufficient to rupture existing tumors, letting them spread to the rest of the body.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6rrUK54lvg

[Mammograms Cause Breast Cancer - Dr. Ben Johnson]

Skip first three minutes to avoid the preamble in this corroborating video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYm3j51ByYk

[Dr Pam Popper - Truth About Mammography]

 

Video from Suzanne Somers who suffered cancer three times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-aYxu4Uys0

[Suzanne Somers Throws Knockout for Cancer]

Body Intelligence

The intelligence that guides the process of healing in the body. How can it be? What is it? Or is it better to say, who is it?


In a recent discussion with a scientist who is well-versed in modern scientific thought, he claimed that all activity in the body operated through many series of feedback mechanisms. He would not countenance the possibility that there is an over-arching intelligence governing the process.

In his system of thought, every action that we perform relies on tenuous electrical connections and chemical associations without any central intelligence. These fed back and forth by feedback mechanisms. This being the end product of a mindless process of evolution governed by random changes in DNA which produce the survival of the fittest.


Illustrated by the atom bomb, we live in an energy universe. But today, still taught in schools, are concepts which rest on materialistic theories. Theories which still use, as their convenient basis, the uncuttability of the atom.


I'm a lover of the simpler explanation. What if the human body is simply the intelligence of the primary single cell, dividing itself internally? Ultimately, the divisions become the organised structure of the human body.


The pattern of the fully matured human being is already there, surrounding and permeating the primary cell. The ingestion of material gives the pattern what is necessary in order to divide and multiply internally. The resultant multiplications lay themselves down along the lines of force which constitute the bio-field pattern of the whole body.


Wouldn't this clarify many of the mysterious processes that go on? The way that cells 'know' how to multiply and what part they need to play in the human body? The way that an injury heals itself? The way that the nervous system organises itself to accommodate a transplanted hand?
The concept of 'the whole is more than the sum of the parts' takes on added significance.
Kill off the soldiers in an ant colony, and the central intelligence replaces the missing soldiers.

The Lancet article: research culture occasionally veers close to misconduct

Be very wary of the drugs that you are introducing into your body. 

The Lancet, the reputable British medical journal is careful in its wording on its scathing description  of modern laboratory research techniques. 

 

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext?rss%3Dyes

"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations. Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as high-impact publication. National assessment procedures, such as the Research Excellence Framework, incentivise bad practices. And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A whistle blower has recently blown the cover on research into vaccination, stating that soem research figures are often ignored when they wouldn't fit into an overall positive outcome of tests on vaccines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q62DcaNs_0M